Task-based oral computer-mediated communication and L2 vocabulary acquisition by I. Yanguas

Posted: July 23, 2012 by kilickay in 2012, CMC, Computer Mediated Communication, Vocabulary

As a language teacher, I am always confronted with the same question by almost all of my students: How can I learn vocabulary in English? The answer to this question depends on learners’ aims and needs. That is, if learners are studying for a nation-wide high stakes exam in which there are multiple-choice questions directly and/or indirectly testing vocabulary knowledge, the very first answer will be to memorize a list of frequently asked lexical items on the exam, practice it frequently using the traditional ways such as flash cards, notebooks, and try to read as much as you can. In this mode of study, the focus will be on recognition, ignoring pronunciation and contexts in which it can be used. However, when it comes to vocabulary acquisition for negotiation of meaning and communication, or in other words, production ability, everything seems to change, from methodology to activities to be implemented.

Yanguas (2012) focuses on enhancing fifty-eight third semester college Spanish Students’ L2 vocabulary acquisition through a within groups experimental design. The study uses Skype as a way of learner-to-learner interaction and investigates whether traditional face-to-face interaction and oral CMC (Computer Mediated Communication- audio and video) interaction will lead to differences in learners’ development of vocabulary knowledge. Furthermore, the article also explores participants’ perceptions of CMC modes. When we look at the materials used in the study, we see that the participants collaborated on jigsaw tasks to combine and use information to achieve their goals. This task is based on The Amazing Race, which is a reality television game show. As for assessment tasks, 16 target words were presented in the jigsaw task to check the participants’ development in recognition, production and listening abilities.

If briefly stated, Yanguas’ findings show that there are no statistically significant differences considering production and recognition abilities among the three groups: participants completing the tasks through video CMC (VidCMC), through audio CMC (AudCMC), and through face-to-face interaction in class. As the post-test which was conducted after two weeks indicate, all the groups were able to recognize the target words, with no significant difference. However, an interesting finding was found regarding aural comprehension development. The participants who interacted through audio CMC group outperformed the other two groups, which was accounted for the fact that they did not focus on visual cues. The results also showed that there were no significant differences among the groups in their development of production or written recognition, which I think need pivotal care. Considering the participants’ attitudes, most of the participants highly valued CMC modes and provided positive feedback.

The author, in the discussion and conclusion section, touches upon a very important issue by saying that

The results of this study seem to support the notion that receptive and productive learning processes are different and, as such, learners might need diverse treatments so that these abilities can be developed (p. 523).

I think this is the very point that we should focus on. In one way or another, through traditional methods and/or CMC modes, we, language teachers, seem to have achieved helping our language learners to develop their receptive or recognition ability. However, we seem to go back to initial stages when it comes to productive ability. Therefore, we should look for ways to enhance their productive skills through various methods and materials.

Yanguas, I. (2012). Task-based oral computer-mediated communication and L2 vocabulary acquisition. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 507-531.

———————————————-

I have provided some references on vocabulary development and CALL for those interested in.

Abraham, L. B. (2008). Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 199-226.

Acha, J. (2009). The effectiveness of multimedia programmes in children’s vocabulary learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 23-31.

Allum, P. (2004). Evaluation of CALL: Initial vocabulary learning. ReCALL, 16(2), 488-501.

Al-Seghayer, K. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A comparative  study. Language Learning  and Technology5(1).

Baturay, M., Yıldırım, S., & Daloğlu, A. (2009). Effects of web-based spaced repetition on vocabulary retention of foreign language learners.  Egitim ArastirmalariEurasian Journal of Educational Research, 34, 17-36.

Belz, J. A. (2004). Learner corpus analysis and the development of foreign language proficiency. System, 32(4), 577-591.

Blok, H., Van Daalen-Kapteijns, M. M., Otter, M. E., & Overmaat, M. (2001). Using computers to learn words in the elementary grades: An evaluationframework and a review of effect studies. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 14(2), 99-128.

Braun, S. (2005). From pedagogically relevant corpora to authentic language learning contents. ReCALL, 17(1), 47-64.

Browne, C., & Culligan, B. (2008). Combining technology and IRT testing to build student knowledge of high frequency vocabulary. The JALT CALL Journal, 4(2), 3-16.

Chambers, A. (2007). Integrating corpora in language learning and teaching. ReCALL, 19(3), 249-251.

Christensen, E., Merrill, P., & Yanchar, S. (2007). Second language vocabulary acquisition using a diglot reader or a computer-based drill and practice program. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(1), 67-77.

Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80(2),183-198.

Coll, J. F. (2002). Richness of semantic encoding in a hypermedia-assisted instructional environment for ESP: Effects on incidental vocabulary retention among learners with low ability in the target language. ReCALL, 14(2), 263-284.

Daloğlu, A. Baturay, M., & Yildirim, S. (2009). Designing a constructivitist vocabulary learning material. In R. C. V. Marriott &  P. L. Torres.  (Eds.). Research on e-learning methodologies for language acquisition (pp. 186-203).New York: Information Science Reference.

De la Fuente, M.J. (2003). Is SLA interactionist theory relevant to CALL? A study of the effects of computer-mediated interaction in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(1),47-81.

Deridder,  I. (2003). Reading from the screen in a second language: Empirical studies on the effect of marked hyperlinks on incidental vocabulary learning, text comprehension and the reading process. Antwerp-Apeldoorn: Garant.

Gabel, S. (2001). Over-indulgence and under-representation in interlanguage: Reflectionson the utilization of concordancers in self-directed foreign language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 14(3/4), 269-288.

Gettys, S., Imhof, L., & Kautz, J. (2001).Computer-assisted reading: The effect of glossing format on comprehension and vocabulary retention. Foreign Language Annals, 34(2), 91-106.

Ghadirian, S. (2003). Providing controlled exposure to target vocabulary through the screening and arranging of texts. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 147-164.

Goodfellow, R., & Laurillard, D. (1994). Modeling lexical processes in lexical CALL. CALICO Journal, 11(3), 19-46.

Groot, P.  (2000). Computer  assisted  second  language vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 60-81.

Guillory. H. G. (1998). Retention of word meanings inferred from context and sentence-level translations: Implications for the design of beginning-level CALL software. The Modern Languge Journal, 82(4), 533-544.

Hill, M., & Laufer, B. (2003). Type of task, time-on-task, and electronic dictionaries in incidental vocabulary acquisition. IRAL, 41(2), 87-106.

Hirata, Y., & Hirata, Y. (2007). Independent research project with web-derived corpora for language learning. The JALT CALL Journal, 3(3), 33-48.

Horst, M., Cobb,T., & Nicolae, I. (2005). Expanding academic vocabulary with an interactive on­line database. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2),90-110.

Hu, H.-P., & Deng, L.-J. (2007). Vocabulary acquisition in multimedia environment. US-China Foreign Language, 5(8), 55-59.

Joana Acha (2009). The effectiveness of multimedia programmes in children’s vocabulary learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 23-31.

Johnson, A., & Heffernan, N. (2006). The short readings project: A CALL reading activity utilizing vocabulary recycling. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 63-77.

Jones, L.  (2003). Supporting listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition with multimedia annotations: the students’ voice. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 41-65.

Jones, L. (2004). Testing L2 vocabulary recognition and recall using pictorial and written test items. Language Learning & Technology, 8(3), 122-143.

Jones, L. (2009). Supporting student differences in listening comprehension and vocabulary learning with multimedia annotations. CALICO Journal, 26(2).

Jones, L., & Plass, J. (2002). Supporting listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition  in French with multimedia annotations.  The Modern Language Journal, 86(4), 546-561.

Kaltenb, Ouml, Ck, G., & Mehlmauer-Larcher, B. (2005). Computer corpora and the language classroom: On the potential and limitations of computer corpora in language teaching. ReCALL, 17(1), 65-84.

Kaltenböck,  G.,  &  Mehlmauer-Larcher,  B.  (2005). Computer corpora and the language classroom: On the potential and limitations of computer corpora in language teaching. ReCALL, 17(1), 65-84.

Kaur, J., & Hegelheimer, V. (2005). ESL students’ use of concordance in the transfer of academic word knowledge: An exploratory study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(4), 287-310.

Kim, D., & Gilman, D. A. (2008). Effects of text, audio, and graphic aids in multimedia instruction for vocabulary learning. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 114-126.

Laufer, B., & Hill, M. (2000). What lexical information do L2 learners select in a CALL dictionary and how does it affect word retention? Language Learning and Technology, 3(2), 58-76.

Lenders, O. (2008). Electronic glossing– Is it worth the effort? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5), 457-481.

Loucky, J. P. (2002). Improving access to target vocabulary using computerized bilingual dictionaries. ReCALL, 14(2), 295-314.

Loucky, J. P. (2005). Combining the benefits of electronic and online dictionaries with CALL web sites to produce effective and enjoyable vocabulary and language learning lessons. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(5), 389-416.

Lu, M. (2008). Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(6), 515-525.

Ma, Q., & Kelly, P. (2006). Computer assisted vocabulary learning: Design and evaluation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 15-45.

Nakata, T. (2006). Implementing optimal spaced learning for English vocabulary learning. The JALT CALL Journal, 2(2), 19-36.

Nakata, T. (2008). English vocabulary learning with word lists, word cards and computers: Implications from cognitive psychology research for optimal spaced learning. ReCALL, 20(1), 3-20.

Nesselhauf, N., and Tschichold, C. (2002). Collocations in CALL: An investigation of vocabulary-building software for EFL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(3) 251-279.

Ringlstetter, C., Schulz, K. U., & Mihov, S. (2006). Orthographic errors in web pages: Toward cleaner web corpora. Computational Linguistics, 32(3), 295-340.

Şahin, M. (2009). Second language vocabulary acquisition in synchronous computer-mediated communication.  Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 34, 115-132.

Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2003). Effects of vocabulary training by computer in kindergarten. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(4), 557-566.

Segler, T. M., Pain, H., & Sorace, A. (2002). Second language vocabulary acquisition and learning strategies in ICALL environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(4), 409-422.

Smidt, E., & Hegelheimer, V. (2004). Effects of online academic lectures on ESL listening comprehension, incidental vocabulary acquisition, and strategy use. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(5), 517-556.

Song, Y. (2008). SMS enhanced vocabulary learning for mobile audiences. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 2(1), 81-98.

Song, Y., & Fox, R. (2008). Using PDA for undergraduate student incidental vocabulary testing. ReCALL, 20(3), 290-314.

Stevens, V. (1995). Concordancing with language learners: Why? When? What? CAELL Journal, 6(2), 2-10.

St-Jacques, C., & Barriãre, C. (2005). Search by fuzzy inference in a children’s dictionary. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(3), 193-215.

Stockwell, G. (2007a). Vocabulary on the move: Investigating an intelligent mobile phone-based vocabulary tutor. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(4), 365-383.

Suarcaya, P. (2008). Increasing student participation in English vocabulary classes by providing time flexibility in accomplishing exercises. The JALT CALL Journal, 4(1), 19-29.

Sun, Y.-C & Dong, Q. (2004). An experiment on supporting children’s English vocabulary learning in multimedia context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(2), 131-147.

Sun, Y.-C., & Wang, L.-Y. (2003). Concordancers in the EFL classroom: Cognitive approaches and collocation difficulty. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(1), 83-94.

Tozcu, A., & Coady, J. (2004). Successful  learning of frequent vocabulary through CALL also benefts reading comprehension and speed. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(5), 473-495.

Turnbull, J., & Burston, J. (1998). Towards independent concordance work for students: Lessons from a case study. ON-CALL, 12(2), 10-21.

Van De Poel, K., & Swanepoel, P. (2003). Theoretical and methodological pluralism n designing effective lexical support for CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(2/3), 173-211.

Yanqing, S., & Qi, D. (2004). An experiment on supporting children’s English vocabulary learning in multimedia context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(2), 131-147.

Yeh, Y., &  Wang,  C. (2003). Effects of multimedia vocabulary annotations and learning styles  on vocabulary learning. CALICO Journal, 21(2), 131-144.

Yip, F.W.M., & Kwan, A.C.M. (2006). Online vocabulary games as a tool for teaching and learning English vocabulary.  Educational  Media  International,  43(3), 232-249.

Yoshii, M., & Flaitz, J. (2002). Second language incidental vocabulary retention: The effect of picture and annotation types. CALICO, 20(1), 33-58.

Yun, S., Miller, P. C., Baek, Y., Jung, J., & Ko, M. (2008). Improving recall and transfer skills through vocabulary building in web-based second language learning: An examination by item and feedback type. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 158–172.

Zapata, G., & Sagarra, N. (2007). CALL on hold: The delayed benefits of an online workbook on L2 vocabulary learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(2), 153-171.

Advertisements
Comments
  1. “Although I am from the earth, I will find you, who from the other planet as long as you are shining and excellent enough, and you will have the opportunity to get our offer.” This is the opening remarks in the special job fair of City College of Wuhan University of Science and Technology from a personnel manage, Zhang Jiajun. His words enclose the distance between the job seekers at present.
    Houston Oilers Jersey http://www.thefootballoutfit.com/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s